London warning on risks of hiring employees as sham contractors

Recently, a clear legal precedent confirmed that the nature of an individual's work is determined by the reality of the actual employment relationship rather than by arbitrary titles. Mr. Gooch worked for the British Free Range Egg Producers Association (BFREPA) from 1 November 2011 until 26 April 2024, initially as a Policy Director on a "contracted services basis" for 2.5 days per week. The organisation, originally an unincorporated association, subsequently became an incorporated company in 2023 (BFREPA Ltd.), although the nature of its work was unaltered.

As Mr. Gooch's role evolved, so his compensation increased and, by 2016, he had effectively been promoted to Chief Executive of Services. Throughout his 12.5 years of engagement, he consistently submitted monthly invoices and was paid a retainer due to his self-employed status, without formally establishing a limited company. In February 2023, BFREPA's leadership expressed concern that their arrangement with Mr. Gooch looked remarkably similar to an employment relationship rather than a self-employed contract, even suggesting that the HMRC would likely classify him as an employee. As a consequence, in March 2023, BFREPA gave him 12 months' notice of termination, and he continued working until April 2024, at which point his email access was disabled, and he received a letter confirming that his contract would not be renewed. Mr. Gooch duly lodged claims against both defendants for unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, unpaid holiday, wrongful dismissal for failure to pay statutory notice, and breach of contract relating to pension auto-enrolment. 

The Tribunal ruled that the claimant was a de facto employee, working under a contract of employment as defined by Section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, Section 2 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and Section 88(2) of the Pensions Act 2008. The Tribunal further concluded that personal service was a core requirement of the contract, one which contained no general substitution clause, and that the extent of the control was consistent with an employer-employee relationship for a senior employee alongside other strong indicators of a permanent employment relationship. The contracts also contained restrictive clauses that limited his ability to work for other companies in the same sector, a feature more commonly found in employment contracts than in contracts for service. 

This ruling provides a clear and detailed example of how a tribunal will look beyond the contractual terms to assess whether a person is an employee or a self-employed contractor. Employers cannot rely on a "contract for services" or a person's self-employed status to avoid the legal obligations of an employer. Instead, tribunals will scrutinise key factors such as the mutuality of the obligations, the degree of control, and the extent of integration in the business. Employers who treat long-term contractors like employees—providing them with a fixed monthly retainer, dictating their hours, and effectively integrating them into the business—risk having them reclassified as employees, and HR departments should ensure that contracts reflect the true nature of the relationship to avoid repercussions.  

Source:Tribunal | 29-10-2025
author avatar
Aitch
I'm Aitch, the Founder and CEO of CIGMA Accounting Ltd. As a Chartered Management Accountant and as a CIMA member, I've spent more than 16 years helping businesses, entrepreneurs, landlords, and individuals with tax planning, accounting, and HMRC compliance. As a chartered accountant in London, I'm passionate about making complex tax matters easier to understand and helping clients make confident financial decisions. Over the years, I've advised start-ups, SMEs, established companies, and high-net-worth individuals across a wide range of tax and accounting matters. My expertise includes Corporation Tax, Self-Assessment, Capital Gains Tax, Inheritance Tax planning, R&D tax relief, capital allowances, international tax, and resolving complex HMRC compliance issues. Whether clients need a business accountant, tax accountant, or strategic tax advisor, my focus is always on delivering practical advice that creates long-term value. One of my specialist areas is Making Tax Digital (MTD). I've worked extensively with businesses preparing HMRC's digital reporting requirements, helping them move to cloud accounting, improve financial processes, and adopt technology that makes compliance more efficient. I regularly speak at Making Tax Digital roadshows, industry events, and educational sessions in collaboration with Zoho Books, sharing practical insights into digital accounting, tax legislation, and the future of the profession. Many business owners looking for the best accounting firm in London are not simply searching for an accountant they're looking for trusted advice, responsive support, and long-term value. That's the approach I've taken in building CIGMA Accounting. My team and I work closely with businesses across London and the UK, providing accounting services, tax advisory, bookkeeping, payroll, VAT, company accounts, and strategic tax planning tailored to each client's goals. Through this website, I share practical guidance on UK taxation, Making Tax Digital, HMRC updates, Corporation Tax, Self-Assessment, and business finance. My aim is to provide reliable, straightforward information that helps business owners understand changing regulations, reduce compliance risks, and make informed financial decisions with confidence.

Our offices

CIGMA Accounting

CIGMA Accounting offices are at three places across London — Wimbledon, Farringdon, and Fulham.

Office 01
Wimbledon
165–167 Highland House
Wimbledon, London
SW19 1NE
Get directions
Office 02
Farringdon
127 Farringdon Road
London
EC1R 3DA
Get directions
Office 03
Fulham
20 Fulham Broadway
The Fulham Centre
London SW6 1AH
Get directions